A new way of power will be dictated by the new pope Francis 1.
Is this new revolution inside the vatican good or bad?
If we want to predict this issue we must leave the idea that the Vatican is the center of the Catholic world and vision it as a State.
The Vatican State has been growing to what it is now by the visions and ideas of past Popes.
The Chapels, Saint Peter, The Statues and all art and artifacts are a legacy of the past Popes
Even the rituals and ceremonies were made to value the highest throne of Christianity
These were the work and the directions of the Popes themselves.
In this view every Pope will leave his own mark.
.Pope Benedict
It is abvious that after pope Jean Pul II the cardinals couldn't find the right man to lead this State.
They couldn't have the possible mean to elect a young cardinal
Or they do not want to do so?
Every prosperous state in the world needs a young leader
The fact that the cardinals will not allow a young pope to lead the Vatican is itself of great concern for the future
The last young pope was Jean-Paul II
Now we are in the Era of the elders
If Benedict resigned it is primary for the above reason
But also for other reasons that can go from lack of confidence between the cardinals and some internal conflicts as well as international conflicts that Benedict couldn't deal with.
The resignation first of all
, in itself is the first resignation of a head of state
And it is the first resignation of a head of state without prior notice.
It is in fact the first resignation of any head of state in all history that comes with no obvious reason at all.
Benedict is considered humble by some , but as it was done this action is a sign of something that went wrong.
Pope Francis
The election of Pope Francis was rapid and swift in the following of what happened
Many rumors say that this new pope was designated by Pope Benedict himself but the cardinals wouldn't accept and elected him instead the last time.
So that this new election was meant to be for Francis
1- Is there a problem in democracy at the Vatican ?
So now this throne is held by nomination instead of election, which seems to be fictive.
2- Upon his first speech Pope Francis litteraly condamned what was going on before him by renouncing on certain signs and practices. Why? Was the vatican so badly ruled?
3- It is without doubt as it is seen from the first impressions that a Pope like Pope Francis couldn't be the visionary of such plans as building the sixteen or Saint Peter or any landmark that is making the Vatican today.
4- On the contrary he stated that everything will go to the poor, and that he will lead a poorer way in Papacy
5- With these words he is proclaiming indirectly that his 2 predecessors were making extravagant expenses and that he will cut these expenses.
The .fact that Pope Francis is proclaming what he will do is a clear sign of revolution inside the Vatican.
Contries that had undertaken this kind of revolution in the past couldn't deal with it too long, because it is always impaired by the fact that one individual is dictating his own rules.
Will he be it's reviver or it's ruiner?
